In the case of Julian Barnes’ The Sense of an Ending,
the title says it all. I think. What
does it mean? Confused? So am I.
I finished this short novel and enjoyed it immensely. But I’m not sure I totally get it, and, of
course, I can’t ask you at this time to give me your thoughts on it.
Our protagonist, Tony Webster, is about my age. He grew up in a time I am totally familiar
with and totally at home reading about.
I recognize so much of what he says and what he does. Perhaps every age sits with a kind of smug
philosophical elitism feeling contempt for those considered too plebeian to see
the truth about life as clearly as they do.
“Understanding the world” and denigrating it as it currently is usually
occurs over a beer. At any rate, Tony
and his three friends see themselves as young philosophers throwing around
German terms and names of established philosophers as a way of affirming their
superiority over the masses. The best
thinker among them is Adrian , and
he is respected by his peers.
When he asks Margaret over a friendly lunch if she left him because of him, she enigmatically replies that she left him "because of us."
Life is never really ordinary, and this book is about
growing up, remembering back in whatever way we are capable, being deeply hurt
and deeply hurting others, and trying to finally understand what life is all
about.
Tony tells his story, so there is so much about truth and
about the other characters to which we are not privy. Additionally, there is the always constant
question about what is history? What is
memory? How accurate is either?
And I, always interested in the title’s meaning, am not
quite sure I get it. Veronica tells Tony
he “will never get it.” What’s “it”?
Indeed, this book was suggested by my sister-in-law with the
warning that it is “different.” She
wanted to discuss it when I was done, and I would like to discuss it with her
too. I want to see how she viewed The
Sense of an Ending. I’d like to
discuss it with any of you who have read it too.
Despite my questions, I highly recommend this novel. It’s thoroughly intriguing. It’s short and reads easily. Barnes has a flowing, descriptive style, and
I got to really know Tony Webster and to understand his dilemma. But because of the first person narration, I
never understood some of the other characters because Tony never does. Oh well, it is so nice to dwell on a book as
much as I’ve been dwelling on this one.
Here are some of my favorite quotations:
“…of course we were pretentious—what else is youth for?”
“…we knew we grasped life—and truth, and morality, and
art….”
“…our fear: that Life wouldn’t turn out to be like
Literature.”
Do you remember feeling and thinking like that? I do.
And then the truth about the “sixties”—
“If you’ll excuse a brief history lesson: most people didn’t
experience “the sixties” until the seventies.
Which meant, logically, that most people in the sixties were still
experiencing the fifties—or, in my case, bits of both decades side by side. Which made things rather confusing.”
How did I know that summer that Woodstock
would be what Woodstock
became? I think (after this book I’m not
so sure) I remember what it was as it was happening.
Here’s a very poignant definition:
“…remorse. A feeling
which is more complicated, curdled and primeval. Whose chief characteristic is that nothing
can be done about it: too much time has passed, too much damage has been done,
for amends to….”
Wow! That is a wakeup
call.
Here’ the retired-in-his 60s-Tony. How painful is this:
“Sometimes I think the purpose of life is to reconcile us to
its eventual loss by wearing us down, by proving, however long it takes, that
life isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.”
Several times during the novel, Tony hums or sings "Time is On Our Side." I well remember this song and sang along. But here's another question: Is it?
In the end I was deeply touched, quite nostalgic, and
somewhat puzzled. I think I will
continue to ponder the meaning of Barnes’ title as I try to get The
Sense of an Ending.